<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Optimization on Imapenguin</title>
		<link>https://imapenguin.com/tags/optimization/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Optimization on Imapenguin</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 13:15:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://imapenguin.com/tags/optimization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>SHA-256 on a Commodore 64, Five Times Faster</title>
				<link>https://imapenguin.com/2026/11/sha-256-on-a-commodore-64-five-times-faster/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 13:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<guid>https://imapenguin.com/2026/11/sha-256-on-a-commodore-64-five-times-faster/</guid>
				<description>Back in 2021 I promised a closer look at SHA-256 on the C64. It turns out the old program got the wrong answer for anything 32 characters or longer. Here&amp;rsquo;s the fix, and then a version that hashes in 58,514 cycles instead of 328,431.</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
